This report shows that disadvantage exists in the ACT, but that it is often hidden by high overall averages on indicators such as income and education.
The issue of domestic and family violence has gained significant traction nationally and in the ACT over the past few years, however, funding and support gaps remain.
ACTCOSS supports the proposal by ActewAGL to engage more deeply with diverse customers (vulnerable and small business) to gain detailed responses to the questions raised in the Discussion Paper.
The Spring 2017 journal offers perspectives on early intervention gaps in the ACT.
ACTCOSS and ACT Shelter have made a joint submission in response to the ACT Government's discussion paper Towards a New Housing Strategy. We have welcomed the discussion paper, and the government starting to work on inequality caused by Canberra's housing affordability.
In this letter the ACT Energy Consumers Policy Consortium requests that the ACT Government considers modifying the Utilities Concession Scheme to provide for concessions for those residents of caravan parks and other embedded networks in the ACT.
This submission brings together insights and feedback from people who experience trouble paying their energy bills and service providers working with low income households on energy issues.
This submission provides a preliminary examination of the nature, extent and consequences of insecure work in the ACT, focusing on impacts on people experiencing disadvantage and the community sector. ACTCOSS recommends that the inquiry undertake or facilitate a comprehensive survey of insecure work in the ACT and gather evidence of the lived experience of individuals and families impacted by insecure work to inform measures to address this issue in the ACT.
The Winter 2017 journal offers perspectives on white privilege in Canberra and its impact.
The ACT Energy Consumers Policy Consortium has made a submission on the Terms of Reference of the Inquiry. Consumers in vulnerable situations are at the most risk as the electricity market becomes more complex and policies should be developed that ensure they are not disadvantaged by increasing complexity and choice.
ACTCOSS' feedback stresses that the ACT Government continue to proactively consult with community organisations, particularly Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander community-controlled organisations, as it develops, implements, and evaluates the role.
The overall assessment of the 2017-18 ACT Budget by ACTCOSS is that while it checks off a number of election promises, the investments made do not meet the community’s expectations about the priority that should be given to those who deal with sustained long term cost of living pressures, face difficult circumstances and do not enjoy the benefits of Canberra’s prosperity and liveability.
This snapshot outlines and briefly analyses the ACT 2017-18 Budget's impacts on people experiencing disadvantage and households on low incomes, and the community sector.
In this report ACTCOSS tracks changes in the cost of living, particularly for low income households in the Australian Capital Territory.
ACTCOSS and YWCA Canberra have prepared a literature review on older women and housing in the ACT. Single older women comprise a rapidly growing cohort facing housing insecurity and the risk of homelessness. Reviewing the literature, it becomes apparent that there has been an evolving body of research pertaining to older women, and their pathways into homelessness.
This submission suggests that priority for infrastructure projects of this kind should be determined according to the relative impact of investment on creation of secure jobs that pay a living wage. We have also emphasised that, as there would be heavy take up and usage of the centre by national agencies and the Commonwealth Government, these should be carefully considered in weighing up how much, if any, investment comes from the ACT Government as opposed to the Australian Government. In addition, we have emphasised the need for any new centre to be environmentally and socially sustainable including disability access.
ACTCOSS’ paper argues we need to assess and progress choice and control within a human rights framework, in addition to implementing a marketised framework for disability service provision.
In this submission to the ACT Legislative Assembly Standing Committee on Health, Ageing and Community Services, we highlight poor general and public sector employment rates for people with disability; specific vulnerabilities experienced by people in the context of broader economic shifts to insecure, casual and precarious employment; urge the government to adopt a sustained consistent strategy which includes hard targets and identified positions with clear lines of accountability; highlight the need for well resourced and evidence based work to change employer practices in the private, public and community sector; call for greater use of leverage through purchasing as well as solid industry pre-employment programs; and the need for policy to recognise and value both social and economic participation.
The ACT Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Elected Body (ATSIEB) and ACTCOSS report outlines community concerns and solutions in relation to the over-representation of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people in the ACT justice system. The report is from a forum that was held commemorate the 25th Anniversary of the release of the final report of the Royal Commission into Aboriginal Deaths in Custody and was attended by 90 representatives across the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander community, ACT Government, and the community sector, including Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander community organisations.
ACTCOSS’ submission to the Productivity Commission highlights the impact of planning processes on outcomes and related long term costs of the NDIS; reasons for difficulties in implementing plans; the impact of communication failures on administration, evaluation and costs of NDIS; the impact of ILC implementation on the provision of vital community infrastructure and long term financial sustainability of the NDIS; and the intersections and gaps between the NDIS and mainstream services.